Logo
DiS Needs You: Save our site »
  • Logo_home2
  • Records
  • In Depth
  • In Photos
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Search
  • Community
  • Records
  • In Depth
  • Blog
  • Community

THIS SITE HAS BEEN ARCHIVED AND CLOSED.

Please join the conversation over on our new forums »

If you really want to read this, try using The Internet Archive.

Boards

Music Social More…

How many tracks do you give it before deciding if a band are crap?

disinfected [Edit] [Delete] 18:25, 8 January '10

Before I start - yeah, I know this is a really subjective question. Sometimes you hear a heart-breakingly awful song somewhere and vow never to subject your ears to that kind of what-not ever again. But say you're (like me) trying to work through the albums you missed in 2009, or someone recommends something new to you - how long do you generally give it before making up your mind?

This is hard because I know some things are growers but sometimes I just cannot be fucked to let them grow on me, like some kind of aural fungus. For example, I am trying to let The Dirty Projectors grow on me (I'm failing, I think I've given up) but today I gave bands I've never heard before Delphic and Naive New Beaters precisely three songs each before I decided they were shit.

Am I too quick to judge? Are you quicker to judge? Should I listen to a full album? Is this just too subjective a question to ever properly quantify? (Yes, probably. Oh well.)

Anyway, I'm curious.


Drowned in Sound
  • DROWNED IN SOUND
  • HOME
  • SITE MAP
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • IN PHOTOS
  • RECORDS
  • RECOMMENDED RECORDS
  • ALBUMS OF THE YEAR
  • FESTIVAL COVERAGE
  • COMMUNITY
  • MUSIC FORUM
  • SOCIAL BOARD
  • REPORT ERRORS
  • CONTACT US
  • JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • FOLLOW DiS
  • GOOGLE+
  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • SHUFFLER
  • TUMBLR
  • YOUTUBE
  • RSS FEED
  • RSS EMAIL SUBSCRIBE
  • MISC
  • TERM OF USE
  • PRIVACY
  • ADVERTISING
  • OUR WIKIPEDIA
© 2000-2025 DROWNED IN SOUND