Logo
DiS Needs You: Save our site »
  • Logo_home2
  • Records
  • In Depth
  • In Photos
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Search
  • Community
  • Records
  • In Depth
  • Blog
  • Community

THIS SITE HAS BEEN ARCHIVED AND CLOSED.

Please join the conversation over on our new forums »

If you really want to read this, try using The Internet Archive.

Boards

Music Social More…

Film thread: Just how open to a sequel can a film's ending be without cheating the audience?

DanielKelly [Edit] [Delete] 10:41, 1 June '10

Sequels aren't exactly a new invention so I'm not going to blather on about current cinema trends scraping barrels or the destruction of film's integrity etc, but I am starting to gall slightly at how often films just don't 'end', ahem, these days.

I've no problem with sequels. Aliens is one of my favourite films ever. But I think that's partly because its predecessor, like Aliens, was a complete story in itself. I saw [REC] 2 last night (it's a bit naff, btw) and it didn't really end. Obviously it reached a point where the credits rolled, but its conclusion was more like that of an ongoing television show, which pissed me off. I don't mind that the writers have devleloped an arc which needs several films to be told, I just want each installment to feel a bit more complete. It strikes me as pretty weak story tellling.

Does it bother you at all? Any other examples you'd care to share?


Drowned in Sound
  • DROWNED IN SOUND
  • HOME
  • SITE MAP
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • IN PHOTOS
  • RECORDS
  • RECOMMENDED RECORDS
  • ALBUMS OF THE YEAR
  • FESTIVAL COVERAGE
  • COMMUNITY
  • MUSIC FORUM
  • SOCIAL BOARD
  • REPORT ERRORS
  • CONTACT US
  • JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • FOLLOW DiS
  • GOOGLE+
  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • SHUFFLER
  • TUMBLR
  • YOUTUBE
  • RSS FEED
  • RSS EMAIL SUBSCRIBE
  • MISC
  • TERM OF USE
  • PRIVACY
  • ADVERTISING
  • OUR WIKIPEDIA
© 2000-2025 DROWNED IN SOUND